I suppose it’s another indicator of his extraordinary impact over the last 20 odd years, that the life of Steve Jobs – much reminisced by presidents and prime ministers; the subject of reams of column inches and hours of media comment; no doubt greatly missed by family and friends; and much lamented by colleagues and customers alike – should spark a debate in the pub last night which overtook the customary dissection of another one of England’s tortuous performances.
Was he a genius, a visionary, uber geek or a brilliant business man?
Like most graphic designers, I suppose I feel I have a personal relationship with Apple having bought my first Apple over twenty years ago. I was still at Uni and ploughed every penny I’d earned from freelance work into the purchase of a Mac LC – the pizza box one. I made quite a few instant friends as, back then, I think the Uni only had 2 Macs so just getting to use one involved hours of queuing only to feel like an isolated wildebeast being watched by a tree full of salivating vultures.
Since that LC I think I’ve bought pretty much every type of Apple product for business or leisure: Powermacs, G3s, G4s, G5s, PowerBooks, Mac books, Mac book Pros, Mac Pros, Cinema displays, all versions of the iMacs, iPods of most generations, all the iPhones and I’m (almost inevitably) typing this on an iPad. I’m obviously biased here but few products bring such joy or garner such loyalty. This may sound slightly sad, but I’m relieved to be not alone: how many other brands engender such emotions? How many other consumer products drive punters to sleep outside the stores just so they can be first to get their hands on one? Or indeed, how many Company Chairman or industrialists would receive the same kind of emotional and respectful out-pouring that has greeted Jobs’s passing?
Despite being Apple’s co-founder, and his name being synonymous with the company, Jobs wasn’t actually at the helm when I bought that LC as he’d been forced out. Leaving aside for a moment the question of genius or visionary, he was undoubtedly an incredibly talented businessman. I find it amazing that when ousted from Apple he then bought Pixar for effectively $5 Million which also turned out to be a fairly successful venture with films such as Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Monsters Inc and more. It was sold for a staggering $7.4 Billion to Disney, which was taken in stock, making Jobs Disney’s largest shareholder. His other business, the high-end computer developer, ‘neXT’ was deemed by some as a failure, but was bought by Apple for a paltry (?) $429 Million in 1996 bringing him back into the Company, along with a raft of technologies Apple then adopted.
Apple was really struggling when Jobs returned, having found itself on the fringes of the computing world and under real risk of disappearing alogether, but Jobs, in conjunction with now legendary product designer Jonathan Ives, launched a new integrated PC the iMac which began to turn the business’s fortunes around. Then, new innovative products such as the iPod, iPhone and iPad have ultimately turned it into the world’s most valuable technology business. In point of fact the second most valuable business in the world after Exxon Mobil. There’s an endless array of numbers that signify this success, but the one I find most amazing is their cash pile, a staggering $75 Billion – that’s more than the US Government’s operating balance.
There’s been so much comment since Jobs died, so many words and articles written that it’d be impossible to read them all, but of the ones I hav
e read, I think Cliff Kuang seems to get to the root of the answer of what was Jobs was [although I've just watched an interview with Apple's co-founder Wozniak who said 'marketing was his greatest strength']:
“Jobs was ahead of his time: he saw usability as way more important than speed and tech specs. Jobs may not be the greatest technologist or engineer of his generation. But he is perhaps the greatest user of technology to ever live, . Those computers that Ive and Jobs worked on became, of course, the iMac – a piece of hardware designed with an unprecedented user focus, all the way to the handle on top. That single moment in the basement with Ive says a great deal about what made Jobs the most influential innovator of our time. It shows an ability to see a company from the outside, rather than inside as a line manager. He didn’t see the proto iMac as a liability or a curiosity. He saw something that was simply better than what had preceded it, and he was willing to bet on that instinct. That required an ability to think first and foremost as someone who lives with technology rather than produces it… People often say that Jobs is a great explainer of technology – a charismatic, plainspoken salesman who is able to bend those around him into a “reality distortion field.” But his plainspokenness had force because he always talked about how wondrous it would be to use something, to actually live with it and hold it in your hands. If you listen to Jobs’s presentations over the years, he comes across not as the creator of a product so much as its very first fan – the first person to digest its possibilities. He blossomed into a user-experience savant. A reporter who asked Jobs about the market research that went into the iPad was famously told, “None. It’s not the consumers’ job to know what they want.” It’s not that Jobs doesn’t think like a consumer – he just thinks like one standing in the near future, not in the recent past. He is a focus group of one, the ideal Apple customer, two years out. As he told Inc. magazine in 1989, “You can’t just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they’ll want something new.”